FAQs

1. What was the main topic of discussion at the Columbia Center for Contemporary Critical Thought Marx 9/13 session?

The main topic of discussion was the Italian Autonomists’ “refusal of work” strategy articulated by Antonio Negri in his book, Marx Beyond Marx, and its relation to Marx’s Grundrisse.

2. What was the question posed to Michael Hardt during the session?

The question posed to Michael Hardt was about how a reading of the 1821 pamphlet, The Source and Remedy of the National Difficulties, and William Godwin’s writings on leisure for all might illuminate Marx’s thought on disposable time and widening the sphere of pleasure.

3. Where can I find more information on Marx’s theory of surplus value and theory of crisis discussed in the session?

You can find more information on Marx’s theory of surplus value and theory of crisis in a previous post by Michael Hardt linked here.

Conclusion

The discussion at the Columbia Center for Contemporary Critical Thought Marx 9/13 session highlighted the importance of understanding Marx’s theory of surplus value, theory of crisis, and the concept of disposable time in relation to the Italian Autonomists’ “refusal of work” strategy. Through a thought-provoking question posed to Michael Hardt, the session shed light on the potential influences of historical writings on leisure and pleasure on Marx’s economic and social theories. Further exploration of these connections may provide valuable insights into the complexities of Marx’s work and its relevance to contemporary critical thought.